Audience intelligence for brands and campaigns
The scoring is published research, not a black box. See how it calibrates against real ad performance.
Raw
Reading
Insight
Output
Learning
How it goes now
The research comes back as a deck nobody reopens, the ad account gets read as one ROAS number a week, and the reviews sit in a tab. So the message ends up being whatever the most confident person in the room believes, and you find out what the audience actually thought after you have paid to say it.
How we run it
We read every source you have as one audience, so you get the split that decides the campaign (which message moves which segment, and where they disagree) before anything is committed. The same read then drives the creative we produce for paid and organic, which is why the content and the strategy stop pointing in different directions.
Wildlife, finance, AI demos, humor, news, celebrity. Same brain-encoding and persona jury grades every format on the metrics that predict virality.
Hook
"Huge Male Grizzly"
@dylan · Huge Male Grizzly · Alaska cold-open
Hook
"This is the cost of not letting go."
@AlexHormozi · How I Would Build a Business in 2026
Hook
"ChatGPT plays with itself pt 1"
@FatherPhi · ChatGPT plays 20 questions for real this time
The engine
First assets land in about 21 days. Here is the order it happens in.
We pull your last 90 days of creative, your top three competitors from the Meta Ad Library, and your organic. Every asset gets scored on neural engagement, attention retention, emotional intensity, and hook strength, so you end up with a map of what is working, what is dead, and why.
Concepts get written, scored, and ranked against a 20-persona audience jury. Only what clears the bar goes into production, and each one comes back as 3 cuts sized for paid social and organic.
Every month we compare what the model predicted to what your account did. The scoring calibrates to your category and your audience, which means the hit rate climbs the longer we run.
Every claim, concept, and asset runs through neural scoring and a twenty-persona jury before it reaches a media plan or a shot list. You see which idea wins, which segment bounces, and why, while changing it still costs nothing.
Score every variant
Drop in any hook, draft, or short-form video. The brain-encoding model scores neural response on the same metrics that predict real engagement.
Overall
94/100
Know who's bouncing and why
Each variant runs through the persona jury. Skeptics, Scrollers, Feelers, Actors, and Sharers each weigh in, then we surface the splits.
Early signal
Predict winners before launch
Get a consensus signal, the drivers behind it, and the tensions in the group. Decide in seconds. Skip the two-week test entirely.
Strong engagement signal. Sharers forward, Feelers lock in.
84% group confidence
Drivers
Tensions
This is the part no agency or research vendor you are comparing us against can do. It is also why we can quote a hit rate instead of a volume of deliverables.
Everything we score produces a measured neural signature, rendered here on a real cortical surface. The pattern is what tells us whether a message holds someone or loses them, before a dollar goes behind it.
Input
Wildlife cold-open

Visual cortex and ventral attention fire hard in the first two seconds. This is the "scroll-stop" signature.
NES
96
EII
81
CAS
54
Input
Personal narrative

Default-mode network lights up as the story resolves. Empathy and self-reference spike together. The "I felt that" moment.
NES
82
EII
95
CAS
41
Input
Structured tier list

Dorsal-attention and motor cortex respond to goal-directed, rank-ordered content. Viewers are being primed to act. High CAS.
NES
88
EII
56
CAS
93
Input
Aesthetic product shot

Visual cortex engages briefly but nothing holds. Viewers are physically watching and cognitively gone.
NES
38
EII
33
CAS
21
Same model grades every YouTube thumbnail on click-through probability, face emotion, curiosity gap, contrast, and the eye-attention path a predicted viewer takes across the frame.
MrBeast · 76M views
TerraGreen · 20M views
Senator Bernie Sanders · 4.1M views
Olga Loiek · 1.7M views
Kallaway · 223K views
Mark Carney · 497K views
Proof
We are early and we would rather show you how the scoring works than hand you a testimonial we cannot back. Everything below is public, with the numbers and the failure cases left in.
Pricing
No per-asset pricing, no media spend markup, and no surprise line items when a concept needs a reshoot.
The read
Ninety days of your creative, your competitors, and your organic, every asset scored and mapped before we produce anything.
The engine
Scored concepts, produced and cut for paid and organic, with the model recalibrating on your account every month.
Canadian companies: part of this may be grant eligible. Ask us on the call.
Book the call if
Skip us if
A UGC shop ships you a batch and lets your ad account find out which ones work, which means you pay twice for every miss: once to make it and once to test it. We score concepts against a brain-response model and a 20-persona audience jury before production, so the weak ideas die on a spreadsheet instead of in your account. The other difference is what we make. Most UGC is built to be spent against and thrown away, while we cut every concept for organic too, so the work keeps earning after the budget moves.
Because testing in-account is only cheap when the creative is free, and it is not. Every angle you test has to be produced before Meta can tell you anything about it, so what actually caps how fast you learn is production throughput rather than media budget, and you only ever find out about the ideas somebody already paid to shoot. Scoring moves the kill decision in front of the expensive step, which is worth real money at $150k a month and worth very little at ten. If you are spending under $50k a month, testing in-account is probably the right call and we will tell you so on the call.
You do, permanently, including the raw files and full usage rights across paid and organic. If you stop working with us you keep everything, and we hand over the scored concept library with it.
About 21 days from kickoff. The first two to three weeks go into scoring your existing creative and your competitors, because producing before we have read the account is how agencies end up making a prettier version of the thing that was already failing.
It will, and we report it. Every month you get predicted against actual for the work we shipped, misses included, and those misses are what recalibrate the scoring to your category. Anyone selling you a model that is always right is selling you a demo.
No. We make the creative and tell you which assets to put weight behind, and your buyer or agency runs the spend. We work alongside in-house buyers and media agencies on most accounts.
Sometimes, for Canadian companies, depending on your size, sector, and province. Eligibility varies enough that we check it properly rather than promising it up front, so bring it up on the call and we will tell you straight whether it applies to you.
Something we did not cover? Ask it on the call.